The study found no impact of random drug testing reported by students not participating in testing on the intention to use substances, the perceived consequences of substance use, participation in activities subject to drug testing, or school connectedness. Now a days, to test the student athletes they can use urine, hair, oral fluids, and sweat patch. Testing for drugs sends a mixed message to students. A drug screen for alcohol done on Tuesday is not likely to find alcohol that was consumed on Saturday night. But there is nothing unethical or immoral about the situation that should lead those interested in maintaining sportsmanship to forbid or severely regulate weight training. Communities interested in starting student drug testing programs should become familiar with the law in their respective states to ensure proper compliance. For females based on 4+ drinks per sitting , the reported rate dropped from 41% to 33%.
For this reason, a series of cutoff levels has been determined and proven scientifically so when a urine drug screen is positive, we know it is from use and not second-hand exposure. Consequently, every sportsman will do his best to win this money. Innocent students could suffer consequences and this could affect where they go in their future, tremendously. For example, 22% of student-athletes claim to have used marijuana in the past year versus about 33% of college students generally. If we want to have fair sports competitions, we should make sportsmen take drug tests. When a professional athlete admits to using steroids, the message young athletes hear is not always the one that is intended.
Unfortunately, we live in a culture which reveres superstar athletes on the professional level. I can see how steroid use would be a relevant and important thing to test for in athletes, specifically those people who qualify for state or national level competition; however non-performance enhancing drugs are irrelevant to sports. Does the old theory stating that student athletes tend to stay away from drugs and alcohol hold true today? Steroids and other dangerous enhancement drugs are unfortunately a large part of that culture. The Supreme Court originally reasoned that athletes can be drug tested because they are role models and can influence the drug culture of a school, and that drug use and athletics are a dangerous combination. Receiving a public assistance is a privilege, not a right. Because the public is concerned with welfare recipients taking advantage of the system they want to keep drug addicts from receiving benefits.
They also claim they are paid in other ways such as a full ride scholarship to a top level education. If some athletes spend much more time in the weight room than others and thereby build their muscular strength to levels significantly higher than their opponents, those opponents who want to remain competitive may feel compelled to also put in more time with weights. Instead of supporting the implementation of proven prevention practices, some administrators have turned to a more punitive and controversial approach: drug testing students. Money was donated from alumni to make it possible. However, in many cases more punitive measures such as dismissal from extracurricular activities or expulsion have occurred.
School administrators are charged with ensuring a safe, supportive, and healthy school environment where children can learn and reach their full potential. Finally, they should be ready to take drug tests then their victory is questioned. The fascination of watching Mark McGwire break the home-run record in 1998 was undiminished by his overt use of nandrolone not a banned substance in baseball , which stimulates the body to produce more of its own steroids. Young students should take these tests too. Those championing the idea claim that drug testing of Welfare recipients in the country is needed to prevent taxpayers from paying for the drug habits of the evil poor people Walters, 2012.
Dennis Johnson follows with a counterpoint making the case that athletes in these sports should receive compensation beyond that of a college scholarship and forwards five proposals to pay the athletes. I found this source with the help of Dan Chibnall. Identifying Students in Need of Help Drug testing is typically just one component to a larger system. Student drug testing and positive school climates: testing the relation between two school characteristics and drug use behavior in a longitudinal study. Only 4 students tested positive for drugs, 2 of which were because of medication. If an athlete tested positive for drug use, the results were reported to parents or guardians, and counseling was mandatory. Jobs will drug test you and professional athletes have to withhold from drugs as well.
For students diagnosed with addiction, parents and a school administrator can refer them to effective drug treatment programs to begin the recovery process. If some of these athletes test positive, chances are other students will also test positive. Bush established federal funding for its use and it grew in popularity. Approximately 23% of student-athletes reported using pain medication in the past year. It sounded like a great idea when I first heard it: drug test high school students! Short term: Even a single use of an intoxicating drug can affect a person's judgment and decision-making, resulting in accidents, poor performance in school or sports activities, unplanned risky behavior, and. The piece of literature here goes on to say that there are yet many flaws in the counseling programmes of the student athletes and the college authorities should. Of course, these arguments are weak, but they have the right for existence.
Where does the money… 850 Words 4 Pages Each year, thousands of high school student athletes graduate without ever having left their mark on the community. The kids who want to get away with it will probably find a way, and it seems like the school district's money would be better spent on another method of addressing students' substance abuse issues. The issue of public college drug testing is one that has not received much attention because no public college has implemented a drug testing program for students that were not athletes. Internet sites give advice on how to dilute urine samples, and there are even companies that sell clean urine or products designed to distort test results. In a local news survey of about 620 people, 55 percent said they opposed the district's plan, while 41 percent were in favor. In order to protect the rights of the American people, drug testing student- athletes without suspicion and without sufficient evidence should not be introduced into school athletics due to the fact that it violates the Fourth Amendment and the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.
With the rising pressure to succeed and the high level intensity in athletics, it does not come to a surprise that so many student— athletes are giving in to drugs. There needs to be a bond a trust between students and school officials, it is very important. Schools contemplating a drug testing program must first document their student athletes are using drugs to comply with the U. His response was hard work and determination, but quickly people started to really question these drastic changes. I believe that money could be saved by drug testing these recipients.
When a sportsman is under the effect of drugs, he is able to win a competition easier. For this, many athletes are rewarded with scholarship money. Students will not be reported to law enforcement or disciplined by the school unless they are under the influence at the time of the test. Teens with substance use problems often engage in polydrug use they use more than one drug , so identifying a problem with an illicit or prescription drug may also suggest an alcohol problem. Alcohol and most drugs are virtually undetectable unless the student is under the influence at the time the test is administered.